A (Hopefully) Useful Metaphor for Neurodiverse Nervous Systems

I should say right off the bat here, that I am not an expert on neurodivergence; as a whole, or on any particular one. In fact, I think if I were, I wouldn’t have been able to come up with this tool for understanding, as I probably would have gotten lost in the weeds of the complexity of it all. So what I’m going to offer here is an acknowledged, gross over-simplification. But hopefully a useful one.

What has been happening that led me to create this tool, is that I have had a growing number of couples come into my therapeutic space with a dynamic of disconnection that is impacted by neurodivergence. If partners process information in significantly different ways, they will behave and communicate in ways that are confusing, and often painful, to each other. And when it starts to emerge that this is the case, it helps explain why they are so stuck in their pattern; partly because neurodiversity is a fixed thing, but also due to the misunderstandings that arise when partners don’t understand their own difference, let alone their partner’s. We make meaning of each other through the lens of our attachments wounds, and we get further and further from each other over time. 

So I came up with a little metaphor. Something that helps people better appreciate which kind of nervous system they most relate to, as well as the difference between how they process information and how their partner does. This way, they can make new and more accurate meaning out of their partner’s behavior in their co-regulation-cycle-gone-wrong, which has the potential of bringing down the temperature on the whole thing significantly.

Think for the moment of your nervous system has having a Richter Scale; a measurement for how stimuli and information, both external and internal, impacts you. A “10” impacts you greatly, a “1” barely impacts you at all. We’ll define the “normal” nervous system as having increments from 1 to 10 (1, 2, 3…). We can say that it has to be pretty quiet (not a lot of information higher on the scale coming in) to be impacted by things happening in the 1-3 range. If there’s anything else going on, those smaller hits get weeded out of our awareness. If we want to focus on stimuli that hits us at a 5, but there are 6’s happening around us, we can choose to do that. If there are 7’s going on, it gets harder, but we can probably still choose to hone in on the 5 for some period of time. Things get “louder” than that, it will likely no longer feel possible to choose our focus. There is a soft rhythm to our ability to narrow our focus, then a need to zoom out into something more relaxed; we focus for a while, we need to zoom out for a bit. If there is a ton of information coming in at any level, or if there is just a lot happening on the high end of the scale, the system can get overwhelmed and lose its ability to process. Overall, though, there is a relative functionality, balance and harmony to this nervous system. 

For someone who identifies with the experience of ADHD, it operates a bit differently. Not much makes it into our conscious awareness at the low end of the scale no matter what else is going on; it’s gotta hit us at about a 5 or higher to register at all. If I want to focus on that 5, but there is a 6 happening, I’m already screwed, let alone a 7 or higher - the primary issue here is the inability to choose where my focus goes. And what determines whether something is a 5 or 6 is very subjective; whatever is personally compelling in the moment is not the same as what matters to us on a deeper level. In short, the urgent outweighs the important. If the “H” part of the diagnosis is real for us, all of that difficulty eases if we are moving our bodies. The overwhelm we are often experiencing is largely confounded by the frustration of not being able to choose where our focus is, as well as the loops we get into as our focus travels from one compelling stimuli to the next without an off-ramp. The zoom in/zoom out thing gets pretty extreme; throwing us down hyper-focused rabbit holes until the satisfying ping of completion, or until it burns out completely into a total inability to do anything but zone. But man, what we can do in that hyper-focused state! And, in a crisis, we naturally cut through the noise to deal with the most essential need of the moment. Our highly associative thinking, taken down rabbit holes, can be extremely creative and lead to out-of-the-box ideas. 

For someone who identifies with the experience of High Sensitivity, or Sensory Processing Sensitivity, we have to move the whole scale up; it starts at 3 and goes to 13. And the increments are not 3, 4, 5…but rather 3, 3.25, 3.5, 3.75…all the way up the scale. Nothing gets weeded out, everything is a hell of a lot “louder”, and there is just a whole lot more information, not coming in (we all take in the same amount), but impacting us and being processed as different. So it takes a hell of a lot more time and energy to process all of that abundance, context and nuance. We can choose to focus on something in the middle of the scale if there is something higher going on just like “normies” - in fact, we are often needing to exercise a very effective “honing” muscle to zero-in on something, despite all of the noise that is perpetually part of our experience. But overwhelm is a constant and very real issue, for which, if we fail to get in front, the only solution is for all and any inputs to STOP. We zoom in and zoom out, but, studies have shown that our minds are never “at rest” in the same way as other people - we are constantly in a state of processing. But, HSP’s have stunning intuition; immediately grasping (while not being able to immediately articulate) both the whole of something, as well as the nuances, connections and ramifications of that thing. And, given the time and space they need to in order to process all of that, they will integrate and articulate it all in a way that is highly illuminating. I call it “circling the drain” to understanding with unrivaled depth and breadth. 

And for people who identify as being on the Autism Spectrum, EVERYTHING IS A 10!

When I give this spiel in my office, I usually pause here for dramatic and comedic affect, as this really does pretty much capture it for a lot of folks. But the downstream effects of this are pretty vast in terms of knowing, let alone choosing, what to focus on, and how to prioritize. Everything carries the same salience and importance. And talk about OVERWHELM. Everything being a 10 is enough to overwhelm anyone, let alone the amplifying effects of trying to suss out what to focus on, what it all means, and how to effectively respond. I’m not even sure what this means for the idea of zooming in and out. Folks on the Spectrum definitely describe experiences similar to those with ADHD here, in terms of the extreme swings between the two. But, given the time and space they need to do so, people on the Spectrum can, in a different way but similar to HSP’s, capture the whole of everything at once, not miss a thing, and provide a take on things that sheds entirely new light on experience. 

So, like I said - gross oversimplifications. But we are all trapped inside of our own nervous systems, and struggle to know how it is different from others in a way that can lead to a lot of misunderstandings and hurt amongst partners. I have found that, if folks are better able to see themselves clearly, they are better at letting in their partner on what they are struggling with, and at advocating for what they need. Hope this helps you with that, or in some other way. In the work I do, we can further make sense out of why, for instance, people with ADHD often get misread as selfish. Or what makes it so hard for HSP’s and ADHD folks to communicate sometimes. But as it stands, if this speaks to you in some way, or if something doesn’t seem right to you, let me know your thoughts.

What Does "Codependency" Really Mean?

Don't get me wrong...I am so glad we have the word "codependent", and all its iterations. It has served effectively as a container for so many of our experiences; a way of making sense out of thoughts and behaviors that can tear our lives apart. But I struggle with how this experience is often described...most of the time, the reader or listener is made to feel that codependency is a trait inherent to who they are...some character flaw, some broken and dysfunctional part of themselves that needs to be exorcised or shamed into submission. But codependency is a trap; a relational cycle that feeds itself because to not think and behave codependently creates a sense of genuine threat, not just to one, but to everyone involved. So I'd like to get clearer about what we are talking about here.

The word "codependency" often points to a trait that seems to draw a person to, and keep them stuck in, relationships where they feel compelled to control the thoughts and behaviors of the other person. A "codependent" is someone who needs to be needed. They are self-sacrificing, do-gooders with low self-esteem.

However, the truth is often that in these situations, anyone with any feelings of responsibility to others will feel trapped into having to control and caretake their partners, because their partner's chaotic behavior creates real dangers for themselves and others.

And making the pattern even stickier is that those of us who end up in these kinds of relationships have often been practicing this relational pattern since we were infants, and can not see another way. We come out of the womb with one capacity, and one job - and that is to figure out how to get our needs met by our primary care figures. And, basically, if Mom isn't ok, we don't get fed. So in a sense, we are taking care of our parents feelings from the moment we are born...their distress is life-threatening to us. At some point, if we are lucky, our parents make it clear that this isn't our job. At some point, if we are lucky, our parents say, "No, no - we are fine, we are here for YOUR distress, and we will take care of our own, thank you very much." Later on, we can engage in an adult process of co-regulation, but for the time being, our parents are there for our needs, and not the other way around. But what happens if that message is never clearly sent? What happens if a parent doesn't send that message, either because they don't understand that it ISN'T their child's job to take care of their feelings, or because they don't even realize that this is what is happening?

Many of us have been trying to get out ahead of the distress of the people we love the most since day one, and for us, this is what it means to love. So we ARE attracted to situations and people that repeat this pattern. And so the idea of letting someone we love flail is impossible to us. And forget it entirely, if letting them flail means we get hit in the face to boot. We have to do something, and not just for them, but for us. It's not a trait, inherent in our personality. It's a survival strategy, related to attachment, that feels legitimately threatening to break.

That doesn't mean we don't have to break it. The problem is, when one partner is always getting out ahead of problems for the other partner, resentment is inevitable on both sides. The partner who is always getting out ahead of problems resents having to do so, and the other partner resents being parented by someone who is supposed to be their equal, whether they need that parenting or not. The dynamic stifles growth and autonomy on both sides, and keeps everyone locked in a battle between chaos and rigid control, with no hope of real connection to be found.

We all need each other, and we all need to feel necessary to others. We all feel compelled to get out ahead of the distress of our loved ones if we feel we can, and we are not sure they will. But there is a shift that is supposed to happen between infancy and adulthood, where intimate relationships become balanced, reciprocal and voluntary. If you find yourself in a relationship where things feel unbalanced, lacks reciprocity and traps you into being someone you don't want to be, it may be time to seek out some help from a couples therapist.

Two Articles Already Available on Huffington Post

Hi! My name is Randie, and you may have noticed (or not!) that I am a new therapist to the area, providing both couples therapy services and individual therapy services from my new location in Cleveland Heights, OH. So I wanted to introduce myself, and it is my hope that this blog page will be a great place to get to know me and what I'm about over time. On my Facebook and Twitter feeds (links below!), I link to a lot of invaluable resources on relationships, parenting, and mental health, mostly written by others I respect in the field. But this will be a place for me to share my perspective on things directly, and I hope it will prove useful to you in some way. 

While I'm working on new material, I wanted to make available two articles I have previously published on Huffington Post. The work I do as a couples therapist is very different than how I write about it, as I am not a huge fan of "skills-based" couples therapy. I tend to think that we largely have the skills to sort of "do relationship", but that if we are not using them, something deeper is in the way. But it's difficult to get at deeper injuries and obstacles, which are personal and unique to the individual, through writing. Therefore, articles on relationships and couples therapy often need to focus on things at the skills level. These two articles are some of my attempts to strike the right balance. Here are the links:

The Trouble With I Statements (And What Works Better)

The Way Out of Power Struggles